In Sciancamerli v. Comtech (Communication Technologies) Ltd., the plaintiff was employed by the company as a Regional Sales Manager for British Columbia, selling technology infrastructure to other businesses. After only 10 months, his employment was terminated on October 10, 2013, and he was provided only 1 week of severance pay. He sued for wrongful dismissal, claiming reasonable notice well in excess of what was provided, as well as the commissions and benefits he would have received during the notice period. Based on his age, length of service and the relatively specialized nature of his role, the Court found that he was entitled to five (5) months notice of termination.
The Court then proceeded to consider what, if any, commissions the plaintiff was entitled to. The plaintiff claimed that he should receive all commissions that were closed during the notice period, while the employer took the position that he was entitled only to commissions on those sales that had been invoiced by or before the last day he was at work. The employer had already paid commissions on all of the plaintiff's invoiced sales prior to the trial. The Court observed that the starting point for the analysis was to look at the express terms of the employment agreement. The commission plan documentation (incorporated into the agreement by reference) stipulated that the timing for payment of commissions was when the sale was "closed, won and invoiced". Upon further analysis, it was clear that this was the basis upon which the employer determined what commissions had been "earned". The Court then had to consider the "termination" provision in the commission plan, which stated:
Participants who [are terminated]… whether or not for cause will be paid their base salary through the agreed upon termination date. In addition, the Participant will be eligible only for commission payments earned prior to their last date of employment….
The Court noted that base salary was payable through "the agreed upon termination date", while the employer was only obligated to make commission payments "earned prior to [the Participant's] last date of employment". The Court found that the difference in the verbiage in these two sentences indicated an intention that the two phrases must have different meanings. Although it was clear that the parties intended that an employee would receive payment of salary through the entire reasonable notice period (i.e., "through the agreed upon termination date"), the expression "last date of employment" was intended to mean the last day that the individual was at work. Accordingly, the plaintiff's entitlement was limited to commissions on those sales that had been invoiced by or before October 10, 2013, as argued by the employer. Given that these amounts had already been paid, there was no outstanding commission to be paid.
This decision highlights the importance of ensuring that employment documents clearly delineate an employee's entitlements to things like commission, stock options and other incentives following the end of the employment relationship. If the employment agreement and incentive plan documentation stipulate that entitlement ceases at the end of the active employment relationship, it is much simpler and cleaner to calculate the final payments due to a departing employee. Consideration should be given to defining terms like "earned", "termination date", and "last date of employment" to avoid any misunderstandings at a time when emotions are often running high.
Do you need assistance reviewing your employment documentation? Need advice on drafting compensation and incentive plans to ensure clarity? Contact Lance Ceaser for expert guidance.